Home

Bruno Barreto de A. Teixeira

           

bruno.barreto@ldcm.com.br


Bruno is a partner at LDCM Advogados and has extensive experience advising clients in arbitration and judicial litigation, particularly in transnational disputes. His practice focuses on cases involving contractual and corporate matters across several sectors, including energy, oil and gas, construction, infrastructure, mergers and acquisitions (M&A), banking, capital markets, real estate, telecommunications, and technology, among others.


The excellence of his work in Arbitration and Commercial Civil Litigation is recognized by leading legal directories such as Chambers and Partners (Brazil Contentious, Regions and Global), Legal 500, Leaders League, and Análise Advocacia.


He holds a Ph.D. in International and Comparative Law from the University of São Paulo (USP), a Master of Laws (LL.M.) from New York University School of Law (NYU), and a Bachelor of Laws from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio).


He is also active in academia. He serves as Deputy Coordinator of the Study Group on Arbitration and International Trade Law at PUC-Rio, where he also teaches International Commercial Arbitration and International Contract Law.


Before joining LDCM Advogados, he practiced in the Litigation and Arbitration department of Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. e Quiroga Advogados. He also gained significant international experience as a foreign associate at Covington & Burling LLP in Washington, D.C., focusing on International Arbitration.


Selected Relevant Matters:


▪ Representation, together with another Brazilian law firm, an English law firm, and a U.S. law firm, of a multinational company in a dispute with a major Brazilian investment conglomerate regarding the acquisition of a Brazilian pulp and paper company valued at BRL 15 billion, including several pre-arbitral interim measures, an arbitration administered by the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), and an arbitration administered by the Market Arbitration Chamber (CAM).


▪ Representation, together with a U.S. and an English law firm, of an oil company in an arbitration administered by the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), seated in Paris, France, and governed by the UNCITRAL Rules, involving the validity and enforceability of a forfeiture clause included in a Joint Operating Agreement (JOA), valued at approximately USD 600 million (approximately BRL 3 billion). This matter was awarded Deal of the Year – Disputes by Latin Lawyer in 2021.


▪ Advising one of the world’s largest multinational technology companies in proceedings before the Supreme Court of the Netherlands (Hoge Raad der Nederlanden), governed by Brazilian law, involving allegations of violations of Brazilian antitrust law, valued at approximately EUR 300 million (BRL 1.8 billion).


▪ Representation of a Brazilian pharmaceutical company in an ICC arbitration conducted in English and seated in São Paulo, involving breach of representations and warranties under a Share Purchase Agreement, valued at approximately BRL 1.3 billion.


▪ Representation of one of the leading multinational hospitality companies in several lawsuits filed in Brazil seeking the termination of international timeshare agreements, involving potential exposure of BRL 400 million.


▪ Representation of one of Brazil’s largest oil companies in 12 LCIA arbitrations seated in London and governed by Brazilian and English law, involving alleged breaches of oil sale and purchase agreements, as well as advising the client in three proceedings before the English courts arising out of the same commercial relationship, valued at approximately USD 100 million (approximately BRL 550 million).


▪ Representation of one of the largest Brazilian healthcare conglomerates in arbitration administered by the Arbitration and Mediation Center of the Brazil-Canada Chamber of Commerce (CAM-CCBC), involving claims arising from alleged breaches of obligations under a Share Purchase Agreement relating to a group of major hospitals located in São Paulo, valued at BRL 400 million.


▪ Representation of a U.S. media conglomerate and a Swiss investment fund in two arbitrations administered by the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) against Hungary, concerning the expropriation of two radio stations, valued at EUR 25 million (approximately BRL 150 million).


▪ Representation of the Brazilian subsidiary of one of the world’s largest retail groups in arbitration administered by the Arbitration and Mediation Center of CIESP-FIESP (CAM-CIESP-FIESP), involving a corporate dispute against the former manager and controlling shareholder of a joint venture, including claims for directors’ liability and abuse of control power, valued at BRL 38 million.


Languages: Portuguese, English, French and Spanish.

Bruno Barreto de A. Teixeira

Ph.D. student in International Trade Law from the University of São Paulo (USP).

Master of Laws (LL.M.) from the New York University School of Law.

Bachelor of Law from the Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio).

Assistant Professor of International Commercial Arbitration and International Commercial Contracts at the Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio).

Professor of the Negotiation, Mediation and Arbitration module in Postgraduate Programs at PUC-Rio.

Deputy Coordinator of the Study Group on Arbitration and International Trade Law (GEADICI) at PUC-Rio.

.

Partner of LDCM – Leonardo de Campos Melo Advogados.

Senior lawyer at Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. e Quiroga Advogados.

Foreign Associate at Covington & Burling LLP, Washington, D.C

Books:

Direito Processual Civil Suíco. Processo Civil Comparado, Vol. II (Thoth, 2022).

Tutelas Provisórias Pré-arbitrais: um estudo comparado. Processo Civil Comparado, Vol. I (Thoth, 2022).

Remédios contra o Inadimplemento. Direito Contratual e Convenção de Viena (CISG) (Almedina, 2021).

Interpretation and Application of the New York Convention in Brazil. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (Springer, 2017).

Arbitrabilidade Objetiva nas Disputas de Petróleo e Gás no Brasil. Arbitragem no Brasil (Blucher, 2016).

Delays e Disruptions nas Arbitragens de Construção. Arbitragem no Brasil (Blucher, 2016).

Reconhecimento de Sentenças Arbitrais Estrangeiras no Brasil. Arbitragem no Brasil (Blucher, 2016).

Diálogo das fontes: interações entre a lei doméstica e a CISG. A Convenção de Viena sobre Contratos de Compra e Venda Internacional de Mercadorias: Desafios e Perspectivas (Atlas, 2015).

Remédios do comprador (e outros remédios ligados ao inadimplemento do vendedor) (arts. 45-52 da CISG). A Convenção de Viena sobre Contratos de Compra e Venda Internacional de Mercadorias: Desafios e Perspectivas (Atlas, 2015).

Cooperação Jurídica Internacional no Superior Tribunal de Justiça: comentários à Resolução nº. 9/2005 (Renovar, 2010).

Artigos em periódicos:

Cartas Arbitrais como Instrumento de Cooperação Jurídica entre Tribunais Arbitrais Regidos pela Lei Estrangeira e o Poder Judiciário. Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem, v. XIX, nº. 73, pp. 9-33, 2022.

System in Progress: Applicable Law and the ICSID Convention. Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem, v. XVIII, nº. 72, pp. 103-123, 2022.

Impugnação de árbitros: uma análise dos precedentes da London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA). Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem, v. XV, nº. 60, pp. 80-100, 2018.

Note: Inepar S/A Indústria e Construções v. SV Engenharia S/A, Supremo Tribunal Federal, Recurso Extraordinário no. 715.400, 22 Septmber 2015. Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem, v. XIII, nº. 49, p. 140-154, 2016.

A Homologação de Sentença Arbitral Estrangeira Não Fundamentada: Comentários à Sentença Estrangeira Contestada 5.692 do STJ. Revista de Arbitragem e Mediação, v. 43, p. 371-384, 2014.

Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: The Application of the New York Convention by National Courts. Questionnaire/Outline for National Reporters. Revista de Arbitragem e Mediação, v. 43, p. 327-342, 2014.

Online articles:

Provas obtidas em procedimentos de Discovery nos Estados Unidos podem ser utilizadas em arbitragens no Brasil? Um exame sobre seu cabimento e admissibilidade. Disponível em https://cbar.org.br/site/o-financiamento-da-arbitragem-por-terceiros-e-o-dever-de-revelacao/. Publicado em 23 de setembro de 2021.

Arbitragem e American Depositary Receipts – ADRs. Disponível em https://www.fgvblogdearbitragem.com.br/post/arbitragem-e-american-depositary-receipts-adrs. Publicado em 13 de agosto de 2021.

O Financiamento de Arbitragem por Terceiros e o Dever de Revelação. Available at https://cbar.org.br/site/o-financiamento-da-arbitragem-por-terceiros-e-o-dever-de-revelacao/. Publicado em 19 de Fevereiro de 2016.